# Talk:Biopsy

WikiProject Medicine (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)

This article was originially taken from the public domain NCI thesaurus, a huge collection of public domain definitions of medical terms.

## Are all biopsies done to determine if there is cancer?

• No. I've had a sample taken from my liver to determine the state of an unrelated illness. --Kizor 13:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

## Breast Biopsy

Why is this article so heavily based around breast biopsy? It makes the reader think one might only do a FNA for breast cancer. is breast cancer just an example?Drchazz (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

## Cancer and Biopsy in Nature Cure

This section seems out of place in a mainstream cancer article, so I've removed it. Biopsying tumors is standard procedure. To suggest otherwise would represent a fringe practice that is outside the scope of standard medical practice. This material may be more appropriate in an alternative medicine article. Andrew73 14:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Depending on the suspected cancer, biopsy is contraindicated. Eg, a mass in a location characteristic of germ cell tumor plus abnormally high alpha fetoprotein: given this combination, some authorities recommend surgical complete removal without prior biopsy because biopsy is likely to involve "spillage" and the risk of consequent metastasis is too high. --Una Smith (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

## Thoughts

I've started a major expansion. My approach is to try to discuss various aspects of biopsy and list a number of biopsies in each discussion to illustrate with a minimum of duplication, while "touching all the bases. Ultimately, topics that might result in lists are modality (direct detection, endoscopic, image guided), indication (screening, surveillance, diagnosis of lesion). As a number of specific biopsies have their own articles, I don't want to overduplicate. I did a lot of this from memory, so I will work on tracking down more references.Novangelis (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

...for the Medinvents Spirotome. It's just one device among several that use less-common variations of sample-removal procedures for breast biopsies. It could be grouped with the Intact, the Cassi, and maybe the Site Select in an "Other Breast Biopsy Methods" section. Although I see no need to refer to the various devices by name. --→ ${\displaystyle JJOlsen}$ 17:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

## External links to Wikisurgery covering fine needle aspiration biopsy and core biopsy (Tru-cut) biopsy?

Wikisurgery has 2 articles on fine needle aspiration biopsy and core needle (Trucut) biopsy containing information not covered in the main Wipedia article on needle aspiration biopsy.

Wikipedia already has external links to Wikipedia articles ie Scalpel Retractor (medical) Needle Haemostat Needle holder Forceps Scissors Surgical sutures

Would the editors care to include an external link to these 2 Wikisurgery articles?Michael Harpur Edwards (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Someone did - but when I tried them (with Firefox) they both just gave me a blank page. - Rod57 (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

## How does biopsy cost in USA split

How does the cost of a biopsy in USA (average cost \$5,000 ? to \$14,000 ??) split between the physician or interventional radiologist , lab, and pathologist ? Does it vary much by type of cancer ? - Rod57 (talk) 22:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

## The Cancer liquid biopsy section seems out of place

As written the Cancer liquid biopsy section is about what is in development and might be useful in the future. It should perhaps be moved to a section such as New developments (although there is apparently an FDA approved 'liquid biopsy' that could be described here ? - Rod57 (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Biopsy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add `{{cbignore}}` after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add `{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}` to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at `{{Sourcecheck}}`).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template `{{source check}}` (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)